Franchise Lawyer

More Antitrust Information::Home

Periodic In House Files Reviews

Author Richard Solomon is a Antitrust Management Counselor with four decades of experience in business development, antitrust and franchise law, management counseling and dispute resolution including trials and crisis management.


Once you have even a hint of antitrust investigational interest possibly heading in your direction, it is probably too late to start reviewing your files to see whether they contain evidence of wrongdoing that might be caught in a government investigation or in discovery in any private litigation.

Think in terms of obstruction of justice, a felony, and of how you don’t want to be associated with suggestions that your company engaged in such behavior. Even a hint of that will cost everyone involved their jobs and reputations.

On the other hand, there are very sound reasons for quarterly or semi annual files reviews in those areas of your company where sensitivity is more likely to occur. In the absence of impending exposure, it is not unlawful to conduct such reviews on a regular basis for the purpose of finding and correcting questionable evidence. The value of finding and correcting conduct that, left ignored, might be likely to generate exposure risks speaks for itself. In that mode, the purging of files is not something done to hide from expected scrutiny, and no one has to hide that it is regularly done. Irregularity of files review says more about it being for questionable purposes.

While it may not be of antitrust significance, no company should ever contemplate acquiring another company or being acquired by another company without a thorough pre acquisition review of all files that would be part of any due diligence associated with such a transaction. The same is true in the instance of the formation of joint ventures, teaming agreements and other forms of joint business arrangements.

These reviews should not be performed by in-house counsel. There is a material difference between doing it with in-house counsel and doing it with an arms length outside firm. The loyalties of anyone who is working for his only client is often misconstrued as pressure to perform more assiduously than might be professionally proper. The cost of that fee savings is often extremely high. Outside counsel will also be able to manage post file review communications with much higher comfort levels than full time company personnel.
 

Copyright 1997 - 2009 || Richard A. Solomon || Site Map  ||

Crisis, Risk, Management, Emergencies, Confrontations, Government Agencies, Enforcement, Antitrust, Insurance, Finance, Cash, Loan Agreements, Loan Covenants, Natural Disasters, Relief, Injunctions, Negotiation, Resolution, Settlement, Renegotiate, Mediate, Argbitrate, Litigate, Rorhanize, Public Relations, Debt, Regulation, Public Statements, Public Relations, Timing, Relief, Balance.