Franchise Lawyer

More Antitrust Information::Home

Vertical Price Maintenance

Author Richard Solomon is a Antitrust Management Counselor with four decades of experience in business development, antitrust and franchise law, management counseling and dispute resolution including trials and crisis management.


For almost a century we lived with unreal rationales regarding the status of resale price maintenance under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. From Dr Miles to Parke Davis to Black & Decker, it was obvious that no judge who ever sat on a resale pricing case had ever been involved in the operation of any business in which it was important that its products not be used as footballs to drive customer traffic.

Pricing restraints have always been the black plague of Antitrust in the United States, following to the letter the comment of Justice Douglas in Socony Vacuum that any tampering with price mechanisms was a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. While that case was a horizontal conspiracy case, conduct that could be characterized as tantamount to an agreement in a vertical pricing case was treated with the same medicine.

The ruled of reason approach in vertical territory restriction cases enunciated in White Motor and seemingly extended and confirmed in Sylvania never until 2008 migrated into the arena of vertical price restraints. Finally, in 2008, the Supreme Court in the Leegin case rules that a producer could offer justification evidence in vertical price restraint cases. If ever there were an invitation to “gloss”, that was certainly one for the books, and a future boon to antirust lawyers everywhere.

As we see it, in the presence of substantial interbrand competition, a producer will be allowed to offer justification evidence in vertical price restraint cases. Looking to rationales like that in the territory cases mentioned above, smaller companies, recent entries into markets (geographic and product markets) and luxury goods producers will all benefit from this ruling. However, until future court opinions flesh out how this evidentiary opportunity will work, each vertical price restraint situation will have to be analyzed for the availability of cogent evidence for a rule of reason rather than a per se rationale.

We have many years experience in fashion, design and luxury products antitrust representation. That head start is very high value to any company in fashion and luxury goods markets.

 

Copyright 1997 - 2009 || Richard A. Solomon || Site Map  ||

Crisis, Risk, Management, Emergencies, Confrontations, Government Agencies, Enforcement, Antitrust, Insurance, Finance, Cash, Loan Agreements, Loan Covenants, Natural Disasters, Relief, Injunctions, Negotiation, Resolution, Settlement, Renegotiate, Mediate, Argbitrate, Litigate, Rorhanize, Public Relations, Debt, Regulation, Public Statements, Public Relations, Timing, Relief, Balance.